InsightsCase Studies
Forensic InvestigationsExecution Mandate

Case Study: Books of Accounts Reconstruction for a Resolution Professional Under IBC

Reconstructing 18 months of missing financial records and verifying Rs 112 crore of creditor claims

By Ashish Chaudhary•September 24, 2026•4 MIN READ•Rs 95 Crore
Client & Engagement
Manufacturing Company Under CIRP
Industry Sector
Manufacturing - Steel Fabrication
Jurisdiction & Geography
India
Practice Leadership
Insolvency, Forensic Accounting & Claims Advisory
Mandate Performance Metrics
Pre-CIRP TurnoverRs 95 CrTurnover of the manufacturing company before CIRP
Missing Books Period18 MonthsPeriod requiring financial reconstruction
Unrecorded Transactions3,200Transactions reconstructed from independent and available evidence
Creditor Claims SubmittedRs 112 CrFinancial and operational creditor claims presented during CIRP

Executive Mandate Summary

A resolution professional appointed under the IBC for a Rs 95 crore steel fabrication business found that the company's books were incomplete and unreliable for the final 18 months before CIRP. Approximately 3,200 transactions had not been recorded, while creditor claims of Rs 112 crore had been submitted. Northrop reconstructed the books using bank statements, GST filings, available company records and counterparty confirmations. The exercise also verified creditor claims and physically assessed assets for liquidation-value purposes. The reconstructed financial position showed negative net worth of Rs 8 crore versus Rs 12 crore positive net worth in the last audited balance sheet. Total admitted creditor claims were established at Rs 94 crore.

Key Transaction & Governance Challenges

  • •
    The final 18 months of accounting records were largely absent, with only approximately 1,300 Tally entries against an estimated 4,500 required entries.
  • •
    The previous management was uncooperative, the company accountant had resigned and the registered office had been vacated. Reconstruction therefore had to rely heavily on evidence outside management's control.
  • •
    Rs 112 crore of claims had been submitted, but the RP could not reliably determine validity without reconstructing the underlying financial records.
  • •
    The RP needed reliable information on actual assets, inventory, receivables and liabilities to support the liquidation-value assessment and comparison with resolution plans.

Northrop Execution Architecture & Methodology

1
Northrop extracted every bank statement entry for the 18-month gap period and classified each transaction using bank narrations, GST data, available company records and direct counterparty inquiries. Approximately 180 entries totalling Rs 3.4 crore remained classified as unverified where the nature could not be independently established.
2
Financial and operational creditor claims were tested against bank data, GST filings, sanction letters, invoices, purchase orders, delivery challans and payment history. Claims were classified as verified, partially verified, disputed or rejected based on supporting evidence.
3
Fixed assets at two factory locations were physically verified. Inventory, work-in-progress, receivables, liabilities and other balance-sheet items were assessed using available records and independent evidence to establish the company's actual financial position.
4
The reconstructed books and verified claims were used to support the information memorandum, liquidation-value assessment and Committee of Creditors decision-making, providing the RP with a financial position that could be relied upon.

Section 1 - The Central Issue

The RP took control of a Rs 95 crore manufacturing company under CIRP and found that its books were largely unavailable for the final 18 months.

Approximately 3,200 transactions had not been recorded, creating uncertainty around the company's assets, liabilities, cash flows and creditor obligations.

Section 2 - Reconstructing the Missing Books

Northrop started from every bank transaction during the missing period and attempted to classify each entry using four independent evidence sources: bank narrations, GST records, company documents and counterparty confirmations.

Approximately 180 entries worth Rs 3.4 crore remained unverified after the available evidence had been exhausted.

Section 3 - Financial Creditor Claims

Rs 74 crore of claims from four banks and two NBFCs were independently verified.

Two claims required adjustment: Rs 1.2 crore of excess interest and an Rs 18 lakh processing fee that had already been paid.

Section 4 - Operational Creditor Claims

Rs 38 crore of claims from 84 vendors were tested against GST data, historical bank payments and supporting invoices, purchase orders and delivery records.

62 claims were verified and admitted for Rs 26 crore, 14 were partially verified with Rs 5 crore admitted against Rs 8 crore claimed, and 8 claims totalling Rs 4 crore were rejected.

Verifiable Institutional Outcomes & Value Realized

  • 18 months of incomplete accounting records reconstructed using independent and available evidence.
  • Rs 112 crore of creditor claims assessed, with Rs 94 crore admitted.
  • Rs 18 crore identified as disputed or rejected claims.
  • Reconstructed net worth established at Rs 8 crore negative compared with Rs 12 crore positive in the last audited balance sheet.
A

Ashish Chaudhary

Lead Reconstruction Engagement•Books Reconstruction, Claims Verification & CIRP Financial Reporting
Private Mandate Advisory Desk

Facing a Similar High-Stakes Transaction or Turnaround?

Northrop partners execute buy-side due diligence, fraud forensics, and financial restructuring with strict board confidentiality and unmatched technical rigor across Indian jurisdictions.

Next Documented MandateManagement Consulting

Case Study: Ghost Trainees and Unverified Placements in a Skill Development NGO

A skill development NGO reported that 1,200 youth had been trained and 840 placed in jobs under a programme funded through a ₹1.4 crore CSR contribution. The reported 70% placement rate prompted an independent review of beneficiary records, training delivery, placement claims and programme expenditure. Northrop Management Private Limited conducted a forensic verification covering beneficiary deduplication, attendance records, direct beneficiary calls, employer confirmations, offer letters, salary claims and the underlying financial trail.

View Full Mandate Record