InsightsCase Studies
Financial ReportingExecution Mandate

Case Study of Hrdya Sara’s Foundation : Internal Audit and Financial Reporting

Hrdya Sara’s Foundation : Building donor-ready financial reporting, internal controls and financial transparency for a growing social foundation

By Ashish Chaudhary•September 26, 2026•3 MIN READ
Client & Engagement
Hrdya Sara’s Foundation
Industry Sector
Hrdya Sara’s Foundation - Social Sector - Education, Welfare & Community Development
Jurisdiction & Geography
India
Practice Leadership
Internal Audit & Financial Reporting Advisory
Mandate Performance Metrics
Findings Identified34Issues identified across financial reporting, internal controls, documentation, governance and compliance
Critical Findings6Findings with potential regulatory or donor-withdrawal implications
Significant Findings14Issues likely to be identified during institutional donor due diligence
Operational Findings14Inefficiencies requiring correction but without immediate material risk

Executive Mandate Summary

Hrdya Sara’s Foundation was delivering education, welfare and community-development programmes but losing donor confidence because its financial systems could not demonstrate how funds were used. Northrop diagnosed 34 issues across financial reporting, controls, documentation, governance and compliance. The accounting system was redesigned to track every transaction by expense nature and donor/programme, while a proportionate internal audit framework was installed. Historical expenses were reclassified where supporting evidence allowed, and donor-ready utilisation reporting was introduced. Within the engagement, all 34 findings were resolved through the first two audit cycles. Donations subsequently grew by over 150%, while quarterly internal audit and monthly donor reporting became established disciplines.

Key Transaction & Governance Challenges

  • •
    All programmes operated through a common accounting pool, making it difficult to connect donor funds to specific activities.
  • •
    Controls existed informally, but there was no systematic testing of whether they were actually being followed.
  • •
    Some vouchers lacked receipts, petty-cash payments were not recorded contemporaneously and vendor invoices sometimes lacked purchase-order references.
  • •
    The foundation could prepare annual financial statements but could not readily produce donor-specific utilisation or programme-level financial reports.

Northrop Execution Architecture & Methodology

1
Northrop reviewed financial reporting, controls, documentation, governance and compliance, producing a structured register of 34 findings classified as critical, significant or operational.
2
The chart of accounts was redesigned using dual classification: every transaction was tagged by expense nature and by donor/programme. Historical data was retrospectively reclassified where documentation supported the allocation.
3
A proportionate internal audit programme was introduced covering procurement, cash handling, expense approvals, payroll verification and documentation completeness, supported by quarterly testing and remediation tracking.
4
Board governance, compliance calendars and formal approval processes were strengthened, while donor-wise utilisation, programme-performance and annual transparency reporting were built into the accounting and management system.

Section 1 - The Central Issue

The foundation was delivering genuine programmes but its financial infrastructure was built primarily for compliance filing rather than donor accountability. The gap between programme quality and financial documentation was affecting donor confidence.

Section 2 - Diagnostic

Northrop conducted a structured review and identified 34 findings across financial reporting, internal controls, documentation, governance and compliance. The findings were prioritised into six critical, fourteen significant and fourteen operational issues.

Section 3 - Rebuilding Financial Visibility

A dual-classification chart of accounts linked each transaction to both its nature and the donor/programme it supported. This created, for the first time, programme-wise income and expenditure statements, donor-wise utilisation reports and comparative programme analysis.

Section 4 - Installing Internal Audit

A proportionate internal audit framework was designed around the foundation's actual scale and risks, covering procurement, cash, expense approval, payroll and documentation. Quarterly testing was introduced to verify whether controls were operating and whether previous findings had been remediated.

Verifiable Institutional Outcomes & Value Realized

  • Donations grew by over 150% following improvements in financial transparency and internal audit.
  • All 34 findings were addressed within the first two audit cycles.
  • Six critical findings were resolved within the first 60 days.
  • Fourteen significant findings were resolved within 120 days.
A

Ashish Chaudhary

Engagement Lead•Internal Audit, Financial Reporting, Donor Accountability & Compliance
Private Mandate Advisory Desk

Facing a Similar High-Stakes Transaction or Turnaround?

Northrop partners execute buy-side due diligence, fraud forensics, and financial restructuring with strict board confidentiality and unmatched technical rigor across Indian jurisdictions.

Next Documented MandateManagement Consulting

Case Study: Ghost Trainees and Unverified Placements in a Skill Development NGO

A skill development NGO reported that 1,200 youth had been trained and 840 placed in jobs under a programme funded through a ₹1.4 crore CSR contribution. The reported 70% placement rate prompted an independent review of beneficiary records, training delivery, placement claims and programme expenditure. Northrop Management Private Limited conducted a forensic verification covering beneficiary deduplication, attendance records, direct beneficiary calls, employer confirmations, offer letters, salary claims and the underlying financial trail.

View Full Mandate Record