InsightsCase Studies
Transaction AdvisoryExecution Mandate

Case Study: Special Purpose Financial Statements for a PE Acquirer’s Carve-Out Due Diligence

Rebuilding standalone financials for an unreported division and validating Rs 62 crore of revenue

By Gopal Banka•September 24, 2026•3 MIN READ•Rs 220 Crore
Client & Engagement
Industrial Automation Division of a Diversified Engineering Company
Industry Sector
Industrial Automation - Division of a Diversified Engineering Company
Jurisdiction & Geography
India
Practice Leadership
Transaction Advisory & Carve-Out Due Diligence
Mandate Performance Metrics
Parent Company RevenueRs 220 CrAnnual revenue of the diversified engineering company
Division RevenueRs 68 Cr → Rs 62 CrSeller-attributed revenue versus independently verified carve-out revenue
Division EBITDARs 12.2 Cr → Rs 8.7 CrSeller-reported versus verified EBITDA
Verified EBITDA Margin14%EBITDA margin based on the reconstructed standalone financials

Executive Mandate Summary

A PE fund was evaluating the acquisition of an industrial automation division from a Rs 220 crore diversified engineering company. The division had never operated as a standalone entity, with revenue, costs, assets, cash and corporate overheads commingled with the parent. The seller attributed Rs 68 crore of revenue and Rs 12.2 crore of EBITDA to the division. Northrop reconstructed standalone financials using transaction-level evidence and an agreed allocation methodology. Verified revenue was Rs 62 crore and EBITDA Rs 8.7 crore. The resulting carve-out financials supported a renegotiation of the acquisition price and established the methodology for working capital adjustments and completion accounts.

Key Transaction & Governance Challenges

  • •
    The division had never been reported separately, with no standalone P&L, balance sheet or cash-flow statement.
  • •
    The division shared factory space, employees, ERP infrastructure, bank accounts and corporate overhead with other divisions.
  • •
    The seller reported Rs 68 crore of divisional revenue, but Rs 6 crore related to shared customers where attribution could not be independently established.
  • •
    Factory rent, HR, administration, technology and corporate costs had to be allocated using an agreed methodology.

Northrop Execution Architecture & Methodology

1
Northrop reconstructed divisional revenue and direct costs using transaction-level evidence, including product codes, customer contracts, dispatch records, production records, material consumption and payroll data.
2
Shared factory rent, HR, administration, ERP, technology, power and corporate overhead were allocated using methodologies agreed by the PE fund and seller before the calculations were performed.
3
Northrop reconstructed the division's standalone P&L, balance sheet and cash flow, including inventory, receivables, payables and fixed assets, with physical verification where required.
4
The verified financials were used to reassess EBITDA, purchase-price implications and working-capital methodology, with the same documented framework carried into completion accounts.

Section 1 - The Central Issue

The PE fund was evaluating the acquisition of an industrial automation division that had never operated independently. Revenue and costs were embedded within the parent company, preventing the buyer from assessing the division on a standalone basis.

The seller attributed Rs 68 crore of revenue and Rs 12.2 crore of EBITDA to the division.

Section 2 - Reconstructing Revenue

Northrop classified three years of sales invoices using product codes, customer contracts and dispatch records.

This established Rs 62 crore of verifiable revenue. Rs 6 crore of contested shared-customer revenue was excluded because the supporting documentation did not permit clean divisional attribution.

Section 3 - Allocating Shared Costs

The engagement established predefined methodologies for allocating factory rent, HR, administration, ERP, power and corporate overhead.

The approach was agreed between buyer and seller before the calculations, providing a common framework for the carve-out financials.

Section 4 - EBITDA Normalisation

The seller's Rs 12.2 crore EBITDA was reduced by the impact of disputed revenue, additional shared overhead and related-party procurement pricing.

The resulting standalone EBITDA was Rs 8.7 crore, representing a 14% margin.

Verifiable Institutional Outcomes & Value Realized

  • Seller claim of Rs 68 crore reduced to Rs 62 crore of verified divisional revenue.
  • Reported EBITDA of Rs 12.2 crore reduced to Rs 8.7 crore after normalisation and allocation adjustments.
  • The Rs 3.5 crore EBITDA difference represented Rs 24.5 crore of purchase-price impact at the stated 7x multiple.
  • The PE fund renegotiated the acquisition price from Rs 85 crore to Rs 62 crore.
G

Gopal Banka

Lead Transaction Advisory Partner•Carve-Out Financials, Due Diligence & Transaction Structuring
Private Mandate Advisory Desk

Facing a Similar High-Stakes Transaction or Turnaround?

Northrop partners execute buy-side due diligence, fraud forensics, and financial restructuring with strict board confidentiality and unmatched technical rigor across Indian jurisdictions.

Next Documented MandateManagement Consulting

Case Study: Ghost Trainees and Unverified Placements in a Skill Development NGO

A skill development NGO reported that 1,200 youth had been trained and 840 placed in jobs under a programme funded through a ₹1.4 crore CSR contribution. The reported 70% placement rate prompted an independent review of beneficiary records, training delivery, placement claims and programme expenditure. Northrop Management Private Limited conducted a forensic verification covering beneficiary deduplication, attendance records, direct beneficiary calls, employer confirmations, offer letters, salary claims and the underlying financial trail.

View Full Mandate Record