InsightsCase Studies
Management ConsultingExecution Mandate

Case Study: Mini Due Diligence for a Small Business Acquisition

Normalising earnings, verifying assets and liabilities, and testing the economics behind a Rs 2.5 crore acquisition price

By Ashish Chaudhary•September 23, 2026•4 MIN READ•Rs 2.5 Crore Proposed Acquisition Price
Client & Engagement
Small Business Acquisition / Promoter Buyer
Industry Sector
Food Processing & Distribution
Jurisdiction & Geography
India
Practice Leadership
Transaction Advisory & Financial Due Diligence
Mandate Performance Metrics
Initial Asking PriceRs 2.5 CroreSeller's proposed acquisition price
Reported ProfitRs 45 LakhAnnual profit reported by the seller
Normalised ProfitRs 18 LakhSustainable earnings after normalisation
Valuation Difference IdentifiedRs 1.4 CroreDifference between proposed price and negotiated transaction value

Executive Mandate Summary

Northrop Management Private Limited was engaged to conduct a focused mini due diligence of a food processing and distribution business in connection with a proposed ₹2.5 crore acquisition, with the objective of validating sustainable earnings, asset values, liabilities and the underlying economics of the transaction. The review identified significant differences between reported and sustainable financial performance. The seller-reported annual profit of ₹45 lakh required multiple normalisation adjustments, including owner-related drawings and replacement management costs. The review also identified ₹6.4 lakh of aged receivables, ₹4.8 lakh of slow-moving, expired or damaged inventory, and equipment recorded at ₹32 lakh against an assessed realisable value of approximately ₹18 lakh.

Key Transaction & Governance Challenges

  • •
    The seller reported Rs 45 lakh of annual profit, but the earnings required multiple normalisation adjustments before they could be used for valuation.
  • •
    The owner withdrew approximately Rs 18 lakh annually through drawings without an equivalent management cost appearing in the profit and loss account.
  • •
    Rs 6.4 lakh of aged receivables had limited recovery prospects, while Rs 4.8 lakh of inventory was slow-moving, expired or damaged.
  • •
    Equipment recorded at Rs 32 lakh had an assessed realisable value of approximately Rs 18 lakh.

Northrop Execution Architecture & Methodology

1
Analysed three years of financial statements, bank statements and Tally data to identify owner-related expenses, replacement management costs, bad-debt requirements, non-recurring income and inventory adjustments.
2
Physically inspected material assets, compared book values with assessed realisable values and independently tested liabilities through supplier and statutory confirmations.
3
Presented normalised earnings, adjusted net assets and identified risks against the proposed acquisition price to provide the buyer with an evidence-based negotiation position.

Executive Mandate Overview

A promoter was considering the acquisition of a food-processing and distribution business for Rs 2.5 crore.

The seller's financial statements showed approximately Rs 45 lakh of annual profit.

At the proposed price, the transaction implied approximately 5.5x reported earnings.

The buyer required an independent assessment of whether the reported earnings and underlying assets supported the proposed valuation.

Northrop conducted a 21-day financial due-diligence engagement covering three years of financial information, bank records, Tally data, physical assets, liabilities and key post-acquisition risks.

The analysis reduced the sustainable earnings estimate to approximately Rs 18 lakh and identified multiple asset and liability adjustments.

Reconstructing Sustainable Earnings

The reported Rs 45 lakh profit was deconstructed transaction by transaction.

Owner Personal Expenses

Rs 8.2 lakh

Vehicle, travel, household, family medical and family mobile expenses were identified within business expenditure.

Replacement Management Cost

The owner drew approximately Rs 18 lakh annually through drawings, but no equivalent management salary was charged to the P&L.

Northrop included approximately Rs 10 lakh of replacement management cost in the normalisation.

Bad Debt

Rs 6.4 lakh

Receivables older than 180 days with limited recovery prospects were identified.

The ongoing normalisation included approximately Rs 2 lakh of annual bad-debt cost.

Non-Recurring Income

Rs 3.5 lakh

A one-time insurance settlement was included in other income and removed from sustainable earnings.

Inventory

Rs 4.8 lakh

Physical inspection identified expired, damaged and slow-moving inventory requiring adjustment.

After the identified adjustments and rounding for ongoing normalisation, sustainable annual profit was assessed at approximately Rs 18 lakh.

Asset Verification

Financial statements alone did not establish the economic value of the target's assets.

Northrop physically verified material assets including:

  • Production equipment
  • Vehicles
  • Inventory
  • Furniture
  • Other material operating assets

The most significant variance related to equipment.

Book Value

Rs 32 lakh

Assessed Realisable Value

Approximately Rs 18 lakh

The Rs 14 lakh difference reflected factors including age, condition and technological obsolescence.

Inventory was also tested physically, resulting in the identification of approximately Rs 4.8 lakh of slow-moving, expired or damaged stock.

Liability Verification

The diligence also examined liabilities that could transfer to the buyer following acquisition.

The review covered:

  • Trade payables
  • GST obligations
  • TDS obligations
  • Employee obligations
  • Leave-related liabilities
  • Gratuity obligations
  • Supplier disputes

Supplier confirmations identified an undisclosed Rs 3.2 lakh supplier dispute that was not reflected in the financial statements.

The finding reinforced the importance of independently verifying liabilities rather than relying solely on seller-provided schedules.

Verifiable Institutional Outcomes & Value Realized

  • Aged receivables and slow-moving or unsaleable inventory were identified as requiring financial adjustments.
  • Seller-reported profit of Rs 45 lakh was adjusted to approximately Rs 18 lakh of sustainable earnings.
  • Equipment carried at Rs 32 lakh in the books was assessed at approximately Rs 18 lakh of realisable value.
  • Supplier confirmation identified an outstanding dispute that had not been disclosed in the seller's financial statements.
A

Ashish Chaudhary

Managing Director•Financial Due Diligence, Quality of Earnings & Transaction Advisory
Private Mandate Advisory Desk

Facing a Similar High-Stakes Transaction or Turnaround?

Northrop partners execute buy-side due diligence, fraud forensics, and financial restructuring with strict board confidentiality and unmatched technical rigor across Indian jurisdictions.

Next Documented MandateManagement Consulting

Case Study: Ghost Trainees and Unverified Placements in a Skill Development NGO

A skill development NGO reported that 1,200 youth had been trained and 840 placed in jobs under a programme funded through a ₹1.4 crore CSR contribution. The reported 70% placement rate prompted an independent review of beneficiary records, training delivery, placement claims and programme expenditure. Northrop Management Private Limited conducted a forensic verification covering beneficiary deduplication, attendance records, direct beneficiary calls, employer confirmations, offer letters, salary claims and the underlying financial trail.

View Full Mandate Record